首页> 外文OA文献 >Do classics exist in megaproject management?
【2h】

Do classics exist in megaproject management?

机译:大型项目管理中是否存在经典?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This special issue asks, “Do classics exist in megaproject management?” We identify three types of classics: conventional, Kuhnian, and citation classics. We find that the answer to our question depends on the definition of “classic” employed. First, “citation classics” do exist in megaproject management, and they perform remarkably well when compared to the rest of the management literature. A preliminary Top Ten of citation classics is presented. Second, there is no indication that “conventional classics” exist in megaproject management, i.e., texts recognized as definitive by a majority of experts. Third, there is also no consensus as to whether “Kuhnian classics" exist, i.e., texts with paradigmatic clout. The importance of classics seems to be accepted, however, just as work to develop, discuss, and consolidate classics is seen as essential by megaproject scholars. A set of guidelines is presented for developing classics in megaproject management research.
机译:这个特刊问:“大型项目管理中是否存在经典?”我们确定三种经典类型:常规经典,库恩经典和引文经典。我们发现,对我们问题的答案取决于所采用的“经典”定义。首先,“引用经典”确实存在于大型项目管理中,与其他管理文献相比,它们表现出色。初步介绍了十大经典文献。第二,没有迹象表明在大型项目管理中存在“传统经典”,即,大多数专家认为是权威性的文本。第三,关于“库恩经典”是否存在,即具有典范影响力的文本也没有达成共识,经典的重要性似乎被接受,但是,正如开发,讨论和巩固经典的工作被提出了一套有关在大型项目管理研究中发展经典的指南。

著录项

  • 作者

    Flyvbjerg, B; Turner, JR;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号